2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,431 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser (97 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser (226 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Crossblade | 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Crossblade | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1984 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3431 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 97 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
