2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 645 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Crossblade | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | MCC | Mini |
| Model | Crossblade | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2595 mm |
