2004 MCC ForFour vs. 1982 Talbot Samba
To start off, 2004 MCC ForFour is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Talbot Samba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Talbot Samba would be higher. At 1,219 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Talbot Samba is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Talbot Samba (90 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2004 MCC ForFour. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Talbot Samba should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MCC ForFour weights approximately 156 kg more than 1982 Talbot Samba.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 102 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC ForFour | 1982 Talbot Samba | |
Make | MCC | Talbot |
Model | ForFour | Samba |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1219 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |