2004 MCC ForTwo vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 MCC ForTwo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Nissan Bluebird (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 170 kg more than 2004 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC ForTwo | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | MCC | Nissan |
Model | ForTwo | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2290 mm |