2004 MCC ForTwo vs. 2003 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2004 MCC ForTwo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC ForTwo would be higher. Both 2004 MCC ForTwo and 2003 MCC ForTwo are equipped with a 698 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 49 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 80 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC ForTwo | 2003 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | MCC | MCC |
Model | ForTwo | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |