2004 MCC Silverpulse vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 MCC Silverpulse is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,244 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 MCC Silverpulse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Silverpulse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC Silverpulse | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Silverpulse | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 699 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |