2004 MCC Silverpulse vs. 1985 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 MCC Silverpulse is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,512 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 MCC Silverpulse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Silverpulse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Silverpulse | 1985 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | MCC | Mercury |
| Model | Silverpulse | Sable |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 699 cc | 2512 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
