2004 MCC Silverpulse vs. 1999 BMW Z3
To start off, 2004 MCC Silverpulse is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC Silverpulse | 1999 BMW Z3 | |
Make | MCC | BMW |
Model | Silverpulse | Z3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 699 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |