2004 MCC Silverpulse vs. 2012 Audi Q3
To start off, 2012 Audi Q3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Silverpulse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Silverpulse would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi Q3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Audi Q3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC Silverpulse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC Silverpulse | 2012 Audi Q3 | |
Make | MCC | Audi |
Model | Silverpulse | Q3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 699 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |