2004 MCC Smart vs. 1992 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 1070 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC Smart | 1992 Mercury Villager | |
Make | MCC | Mercury |
Model | Smart | Villager |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 696 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2860 mm |