2004 MCC Smart vs. 1996 Mini MK VII

To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mini MK VII is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mini MK VII (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VII should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MCC Smart weights approximately 85 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VII.

Because 2004 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VII, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mini MK VII (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1996 Mini MK VII will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Smart.

Compare all specifications:

2004 MCC Smart 1996 Mini MK VII
Make MCC Mini
Model Smart MK VII
Year Released 2004 1996
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 698 cc 1275 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 81 HP 96 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6130 RPM
Torque 112 Nm 115 Nm
Torque RPM 2250 RPM 2650 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 820 kg 735 kg
Vehicle Length 3440 mm 3060 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1450 mm
Vehicle Height 1200 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2040 mm