2004 MCC Smart vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Helem. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Helem would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 429 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 830 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MCC Smart (112 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 2004 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Smart | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | MCC | Renault |
| Model | Smart | Helem |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2680 mm |
