2004 MCC Smart vs. 2011 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2011 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Smart. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Smart | 2011 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Smart | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 696 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2640 mm |
