2004 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 685 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C (310 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz C | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | C | 220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 144 Nm |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |