2004 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C (361 HP) has 174 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C (510 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz C | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jeep |
Model | C | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5439 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |