2004 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 290 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (260 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz C. (220 Nm). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz C | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mini |
Model | C | Roadster |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |