2004 Mercedes-Benz CL vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,439 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (494 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 392 more horse power than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (102 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 914 kg more than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (800 Nm) has 633 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CL | 1975 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
Model | CL | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5439 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 98 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2029 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 65 L |