2004 Mercedes-Benz CL vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (302 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 455 kg more than 1986 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CL | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | CL | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4966 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 99 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 68.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3030 mm |