2004 Mercedes-Benz CL vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL would be higher. At 5,439 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (494 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (227 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 576 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL (800 Nm) has 480 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo C30. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CL | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CL | C30 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5439 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 320 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2029 kg | 1453 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4265 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 60 L |