2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 235 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | CLK GTR | RM A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 4998 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2870 mm |