2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 887 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR has manual transmission. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Dodge |
| Model | CLK GTR | Charger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4998 cc | 6100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 425 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1887 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1466 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3048 mm |
