2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 2011 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2011 Suzuki Equator is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR weights approximately 25 kg more than 2011 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 2011 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
| Model | CLK GTR | Equator |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4998 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3200 mm |
