2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 687 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | CLK GTR | Mustang |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4998 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 412 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |