2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (167 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 35 kg more than 1947 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CLK | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2850 mm |