2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (167 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 135 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Talbot |
Model | CLK | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3160 mm |