2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 532 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (510 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | CLK | Renown |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5441 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1812 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2750 mm |
