2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1963 Steyr 700C
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 342 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1109 kg more than 1963 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (510 Nm) has 469 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 700C. (41 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1963 Steyr 700C | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Steyr |
Model | CLK | 700C |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 5441 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 41 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1649 kg | 540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1950 mm |