2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 855 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
| Model | CLK | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2010 mm |
