2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (510 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | CLK | 66 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5441 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
