2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1980 Mini Clubman
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1056 kg more than 1980 Mini Clubman.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1980 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mini |
Model | CLK | Clubman |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2140 mm |