2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (311 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (176 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | CLK | Carisma |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |