2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (380 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (311 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | CLK | SS |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 380 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |