2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (582 HP) has 220 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (362 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 weights approximately 653 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (773 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (510 Nm). This means 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | CLK | T V-12 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5441 cc | 7255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 582 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 773 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1649 kg | 2302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2810 mm |