2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota F-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota F-1 would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2002 Toyota F-1. (183 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota F-1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 202 kg more than 2002 Toyota F-1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (510 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota F-1. (430 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota F-1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | CLK | F-1 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5441 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1812 kg | 1610 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |
