2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 987 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (800 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche. (739 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rolls-Royce |
Model | CLK | Corniche |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5437 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 574 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 800 Nm | 739 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 104.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 99.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1748 kg | 2735 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 100 L |