2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS (469 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 403 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 640 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS (701 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 555 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | CLS | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5439 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 701 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |