2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS (469 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 442 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS (701 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 664 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
| Model | CLS | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 5439 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 701 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
