2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1996 Rover 220
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 220 would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS (469 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 366 more horse power than 1996 Rover 220. (103 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 746 kg more than 1996 Rover 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 220, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS (701 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 491 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 220. (210 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 220. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 220 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1996 Rover 220 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
| Model | CLS | 220 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5439 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 469 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 701 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 89 mm |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 1214 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 20.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.6 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |
