2004 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 760 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E (350 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz E | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | E | 220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3497 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |