2004 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E (221 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E (300 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz E | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | E | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 46 L |