2004 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP) has 248 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1001 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | ML | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4966 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 40 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 2211 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2540 mm |
