2004 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML (187 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML (440 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | ML | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2110 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2540 mm |
