2004 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | ML | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2110 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 50 L |
