2004 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2009 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2009 Nissan Micra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Micra. (87 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 769 kg more than 2009 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Micra. (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Micra. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan Micra has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan Micra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz ML | 2009 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | ML | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4966 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 460 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.9 seconds | 13.4 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2211 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 46 L |