2004 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML would be higher. At 3,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML (232 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML (331 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mercedes-Benz ML 2010 Nissan X-Trail
Make Mercedes-Benz Nissan
Model ML X-Trail
Year Released 2004 2010
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3720 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 232 HP 137 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 331 Nm 198 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4400 RPM
Top Speed 215 km/hour 182 km/hour
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1920 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.7 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 86 L 65 L