2004 Mercedes-Benz S vs. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo
To start off, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz S would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 107 kg more than 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz S (800 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo. (489 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz S | 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Maserati |
Model | S | Gran Turismo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7600 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 489 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2091 kg | 1984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2056 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1353 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2942 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 75 L |