2004 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1960 Steyr 500
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Steyr 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Steyr 500 would be higher. At 5,513 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 474 more horse power than 1960 Steyr 500. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1960 Steyr 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 1473 kg more than 1960 Steyr 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (700 Nm) has 668 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Steyr 500. (32 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Steyr 500.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1960 Steyr 500 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Steyr |
Model | SL | 500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Size | 5513 cc | 489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 700 Nm | 32 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1959 kg | 486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 1850 mm |