2004 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1997 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 5,439 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1997 Oldsmobile SS. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1997 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (800 Nm) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1997 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | SL | SS |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5439 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 318 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1900 mm |