2004 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 5,513 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-09. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 103 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Because 2013 Mazda CX-09 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (700 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (366 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
Model | SL | CX-09 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5513 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 700 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1959 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 76 L |