2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 811 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK (271 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Seat |
| Model | SLK | 600 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 192 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2010 mm |
